因为认识的师傅们都开始卷 fuzz 了,迫于生活压力,于是也开始看这方面的内容了。由于 AFL 作为一个现在仍然适用且比较经典的 fuzzer,因此笔者也打算从它开始。
本来,本篇博文叫做 《AFL 源代码阅读笔记》,结果跟着大佬们的笔记去读(sakura师傅的笔记确实是神中神,本文也有很多地方照搬了师傅的原文,因为说实话我觉得自己也写不到那么详细),囫囵吞枣般速通了,前前后后三天时间这样,但感觉自己尚且没有自己实现的能力,还是比较令人失望的(我怎么这么菜)
首先,一般我们用 afl 去 fuzz 一些项目的时候都需要用 afl-gcc 去代替 gcc 进行编译。先说结论,这一步的目的其实是为了向代码中插桩,完成插桩后其实还是调用原生的 gcc 进行编译。
1
|
其实这个描述有些偏颇,插桩其实是 afl
-
as 负责的,不过在这里,笔者将 afl
-
gcc 和 afl
-
as 放到同一节,因此用了这样的表述,下文会具体分析 afl
-
as 的原理。
|
首先需要说明的是,gcc 对代码的编译流程的分层次的:
源代码-->预编译后的源代码-->汇编代码-->机器码-->链接后的二进制文件
其中,从源代码到汇编代码的步骤由 gcc 完成;而汇编代码到机器码的部分由 as 完成。
而 afl-gcc 的源代码如下:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
int
main(
int
argc, char
*
*
argv) {
.......
find_as(argv[
0
]);
edit_params(argc, argv);
execvp(cc_params[
0
], (char
*
*
)cc_params);
FATAL(
"Oops, failed to execute '%s' - check your PATH"
, cc_params[
0
]);
return
0
;
}
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
|
static void edit_params(u32 argc, char
*
*
argv) {
......
#else
if
(!strcmp(name,
"afl-g++"
)) {
u8
*
alt_cxx
=
getenv(
"AFL_CXX"
);
cc_params[
0
]
=
alt_cxx ? alt_cxx : (u8
*
)
"g++"
;
}
else
if
(!strcmp(name,
"afl-gcj"
)) {
u8
*
alt_cc
=
getenv(
"AFL_GCJ"
);
cc_params[
0
]
=
alt_cc ? alt_cc : (u8
*
)
"gcj"
;
}
else
{
u8
*
alt_cc
=
getenv(
"AFL_CC"
);
cc_params[
0
]
=
alt_cc ? alt_cc : (u8
*
)
"gcc"
;
}
#endif /* __APPLE__ */
}
while
(
-
-
argc) {
u8
*
cur
=
*
(
+
+
argv);
if
(!strncmp(cur,
"-B"
,
2
)) {
if
(!be_quiet) WARNF(
"-B is already set, overriding"
);
if
(!cur[
2
] && argc >
1
) { argc
-
-
; argv
+
+
; }
continue
;
}
if
(!strcmp(cur,
"-integrated-as"
))
continue
;
if
(!strcmp(cur,
"-pipe"
))
continue
;
#if defined(__FreeBSD__) && defined(__x86_64__)
if
(!strcmp(cur,
"-m32"
)) m32_set
=
1
;
#endif
if
(!strcmp(cur,
"-fsanitize=address"
) ||
!strcmp(cur,
"-fsanitize=memory"
)) asan_set
=
1
;
if
(strstr(cur,
"FORTIFY_SOURCE"
)) fortify_set
=
1
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
cur;
}
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-B"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
as_path;
if
(clang_mode)
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-no-integrated-as"
;
if
(getenv(
"AFL_HARDEN"
)) {
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fstack-protector-all"
;
if
(!fortify_set)
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
;
}
if
(asan_set) {
/
*
Pass this on to afl
-
as to adjust
map
density.
*
/
setenv(
"AFL_USE_ASAN"
,
"1"
,
1
);
}
else
if
(getenv(
"AFL_USE_ASAN"
)) {
if
(getenv(
"AFL_USE_MSAN"
))
FATAL(
"ASAN and MSAN are mutually exclusive"
);
if
(getenv(
"AFL_HARDEN"
))
FATAL(
"ASAN and AFL_HARDEN are mutually exclusive"
);
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fsanitize=address"
;
}
else
if
(getenv(
"AFL_USE_MSAN"
)) {
if
(getenv(
"AFL_USE_ASAN"
))
FATAL(
"ASAN and MSAN are mutually exclusive"
);
if
(getenv(
"AFL_HARDEN"
))
FATAL(
"MSAN and AFL_HARDEN are mutually exclusive"
);
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fsanitize=memory"
;
}
if
(!getenv(
"AFL_DONT_OPTIMIZE"
)) {
#if defined(__FreeBSD__) && defined(__x86_64__)
/
*
On
64
-
bit FreeBSD systems, clang
-
g
-
m32
is
broken, but
-
m32 itself
works OK. This has nothing to do with us, but let's avoid triggering
that bug.
*
/
if
(!clang_mode || !m32_set)
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-g"
;
#else
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-g"
;
#endif
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-O3"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-funroll-loops"
;
/
*
Two indicators that you're building
for
fuzzing; one of them
is
AFL
-
specific, the other
is
shared with libfuzzer.
*
/
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-D__AFL_COMPILER=1"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-DFUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION=1"
;
}
if
(getenv(
"AFL_NO_BUILTIN"
)) {
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-strcmp"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-strncmp"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-strcasecmp"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-strncasecmp"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-memcmp"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-strstr"
;
cc_params[cc_par_cnt
+
+
]
=
"-fno-builtin-strcasestr"
;
}
cc_params[cc_par_cnt]
=
NULL;
}
|
挺长的,不过逻辑基本上都是重复的,主要做两件事:
在完成了汇编以后,接下来会使用 afl-as 对生成的汇编代码进行插桩:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
|
int
main(
int
argc, char
*
*
argv) {
......
gettimeofday(&tv, &tz);
rand_seed
=
tv.tv_sec ^ tv.tv_usec ^ getpid();
srandom(rand_seed);
edit_params(argc, argv);
......
if
(!just_version) add_instrumentation();
if
(!(pid
=
fork())) {
execvp(as_params[
0
], (char
*
*
)as_params);
FATAL(
"Oops, failed to execute '%s' - check your PATH"
, as_params[
0
]);
}
if
(pid <
0
) PFATAL(
"fork() failed"
);
if
(waitpid(pid, &status,
0
) <
=
0
) PFATAL(
"waitpid() failed"
);
if
(!getenv(
"AFL_KEEP_ASSEMBLY"
)) unlink(modified_file);
exit(WEXITSTATUS(status));
}
|
在 afl-as
中,仍然使用 edit_params
编辑和修改参数,并使用 add_instrumentation
来对生成的汇编代码进行插桩。完成插桩后,用 fork 生成子进程,并调用原生的 as 进行编译。
插桩逻辑也很朴素:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
|
static void add_instrumentation(void) {
......
/
*
If we're
in
the right mood
for
instrumenting, check
for
function
names
or
conditional labels. This
is
a bit messy, but
in
essence,
we want to catch:
^main:
-
function entry point (always instrumented)
^.L0:
-
GCC branch label
^.LBB0_0:
-
clang branch label (but only
in
clang mode)
^\tjnz foo
-
conditional branches
...but
not
:
^
# BB#0: - clang comments
^
# BB#0: - ditto
^.Ltmp0:
-
clang non
-
branch labels
^.LC0
-
GCC non
-
branch labels
^.LBB0_0:
-
ditto (when
in
GCC mode)
^\tjmp foo
-
non
-
conditional jumps
Additionally, clang
and
GCC on MacOS X follow a different convention
with no leading dots on labels, hence the weird maze of
#ifdefs
later on.
*
/
if
(skip_intel || skip_app || skip_csect || !instr_ok ||
line[
0
]
=
=
'#'
|| line[
0
]
=
=
' '
)
continue
;
/
*
Conditional branch instruction (jnz, etc). We append the instrumentation
right after the branch (to instrument the
not
-
taken path)
and
at the
branch destination label (handled later on).
*
/
if
(line[
0
]
=
=
'\t'
) {
if
(line[
1
]
=
=
'j'
&& line[
2
] !
=
'm'
&& R(
100
) < inst_ratio) {
fprintf(outf, use_64bit ? trampoline_fmt_64 : trampoline_fmt_32,
R(MAP_SIZE));
ins_lines
+
+
;
}
continue
;
}
/
*
Label of some sort. This may be a branch destination, but we need to
tread carefully
and
account
for
several different formatting
conventions.
*
/
#ifdef __APPLE__
/
*
Apple: L<whatever><digit>:
*
/
if
((colon_pos
=
strstr(line,
":"
))) {
if
(line[
0
]
=
=
'L'
&& isdigit(
*
(colon_pos
-
1
))) {
#else
/
*
Everybody
else
: .L<whatever>:
*
/
if
(strstr(line,
":"
)) {
if
(line[
0
]
=
=
'.'
) {
#endif /* __APPLE__ */
/
*
.L0:
or
LBB0_0: style jump destination
*
/
#ifdef __APPLE__
/
*
Apple: L<num>
/
LBB<num>
*
/
if
((isdigit(line[
1
]) || (clang_mode && !strncmp(line,
"LBB"
,
3
)))
&& R(
100
) < inst_ratio) {
#else
/
*
Apple: .L<num>
/
.LBB<num>
*
/
if
((isdigit(line[
2
]) || (clang_mode && !strncmp(line
+
1
,
"LBB"
,
3
)))
&& R(
100
) < inst_ratio) {
#endif /* __APPLE__ */
/
*
An optimization
is
possible here by adding the code only
if
the
label
is
mentioned
in
the code
in
contexts other than call
/
jmp.
That said, this complicates the code by requiring two
-
pass
processing (messy with stdin),
and
results
in
a speed gain
typically under
10
%
, because compilers are generally pretty good
about
not
generating spurious intra
-
function jumps.
We use deferred output chiefly to avoid disrupting
.Lfunc_begin0
-
style exception handling calculations (a problem on
MacOS X).
*
/
if
(!skip_next_label) instrument_next
=
1
;
else
skip_next_label
=
0
;
}
}
else
{
/
*
Function label (always instrumented, deferred mode).
*
/
instrument_next
=
1
;
}
}
}
if
(ins_lines)
fputs(use_64bit ? main_payload_64 : main_payload_32, outf);
if
(input_file) fclose(inf);
fclose(outf);
if
(!be_quiet) {
if
(!ins_lines) WARNF(
"No instrumentation targets found%s."
,
pass_thru ?
" (pass-thru mode)"
: "");
else
OKF(
"Instrumented %u locations (%s-bit, %s mode, ratio %u%%)."
,
ins_lines, use_64bit ?
"64"
:
"32"
,
getenv(
"AFL_HARDEN"
) ?
"hardened"
:
(sanitizer ?
"ASAN/MSAN"
:
"non-hardened"
),
inst_ratio);
}
}
|
简单来说就是一个循环读取每行汇编代码,并对特定的汇编代码进行插桩:
text
内存段main
函数或分支跳转指令则进行插桩插桩的具体代码保存在 afl-as.h
中,在最后一节中笔者会另外介绍,这里我们可以暂时忽略它的实现细节继续往下。
按照顺序,现在程序是编译好了,接下来就要用 afl-fuzz
对它进行模糊测试了。
一般来说,我们会用 afl-fuzz -i input -o output -- programe
启动 fuzzer,对应的,afl-fuzz.c
中的前半部分都在做参数解析的工作:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
int
main(
int
argc, char
*
*
argv) {
......
gettimeofday(&tv, &tz);
srandom(tv.tv_sec ^ tv.tv_usec ^ getpid());
while
((opt
=
getopt(argc, argv,
"+i:o:f:m:b:t:T:dnCB:S:M:x:QV"
)) >
0
)
switch (opt) {
case
'i'
:
/
*
input
dir
*
/
if
(in_dir) FATAL(
"Multiple -i options not supported"
);
in_dir
=
optarg;
if
(!strcmp(in_dir,
"-"
)) in_place_resume
=
1
;
break
;
case
'o'
:
/
*
output
dir
*
/
if
(out_dir) FATAL(
"Multiple -o options not supported"
);
out_dir
=
optarg;
break
;
......
case
'V'
:
/
*
Show version number
*
/
/
*
Version number has been printed already, just quit.
*
/
exit(
0
);
default:
usage(argv[
0
]);
}
|
这部分我们大致看一下就行了,主要的关注点自然不在参数解析部分。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
|
int
main(
int
argc, char
*
*
argv) {
......
setup_signal_handlers();
check_asan_opts();
if
(sync_id) fix_up_sync();
if
(!strcmp(in_dir, out_dir))
FATAL(
"Input and output directories can't be the same"
);
if
(dumb_mode) {
if
(crash_mode) FATAL(
"-C and -n are mutually exclusive"
);
if
(qemu_mode) FATAL(
"-Q and -n are mutually exclusive"
);
}
if
(getenv(
"AFL_NO_FORKSRV"
)) no_forkserver
=
1
;
if
(getenv(
"AFL_NO_CPU_RED"
)) no_cpu_meter_red
=
1
;
if
(getenv(
"AFL_NO_ARITH"
)) no_arith
=
1
;
if
(getenv(
"AFL_SHUFFLE_QUEUE"
)) shuffle_queue
=
1
;
if
(getenv(
"AFL_FAST_CAL"
)) fast_cal
=
1
;
if
(getenv(
"AFL_HANG_TMOUT"
)) {
hang_tmout
=
atoi(getenv(
"AFL_HANG_TMOUT"
));
if
(!hang_tmout) FATAL(
"Invalid value of AFL_HANG_TMOUT"
);
}
if
(dumb_mode
=
=
2
&& no_forkserver)
FATAL(
"AFL_DUMB_FORKSRV and AFL_NO_FORKSRV are mutually exclusive"
);
if
(getenv(
"AFL_PRELOAD"
)) {
setenv(
"LD_PRELOAD"
, getenv(
"AFL_PRELOAD"
),
1
);
setenv(
"DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES"
, getenv(
"AFL_PRELOAD"
),
1
);
}
if
(getenv(
"AFL_LD_PRELOAD"
))
FATAL(
"Use AFL_PRELOAD instead of AFL_LD_PRELOAD"
);
save_cmdline(argc, argv);
fix_up_banner(argv[optind]);
check_if_tty();
get_core_count();
#ifdef HAVE_AFFINITY
bind_to_free_cpu();
#endif /* HAVE_AFFINITY */
check_crash_handling();
check_cpu_governor();
setup_post();
setup_shm();
init_count_class16();
setup_dirs_fds();
read_testcases();
load_auto();
pivot_inputs();
if
(extras_dir) load_extras(extras_dir);
if
(!timeout_given) find_timeout();
detect_file_args(argv
+
optind
+
1
);
if
(!out_file) setup_stdio_file();
check_binary(argv[optind]);
start_time
=
get_cur_time();
if
(qemu_mode)
use_argv
=
get_qemu_argv(argv[
0
], argv
+
optind, argc
-
optind);
else
use_argv
=
argv
+
optind;
perform_dry_run(use_argv);
cull_queue();
show_init_stats();
seek_to
=
find_start_position();
write_stats_file(
0
,
0
,
0
);
save_auto();
if
(stop_soon) goto stop_fuzzing;
/
*
Woop woop woop
*
/
if
(!not_on_tty) {
sleep(
4
);
start_time
+
=
4000
;
if
(stop_soon) goto stop_fuzzing;
}
while
(
1
) {
u8 skipped_fuzz;
cull_queue();
if
(!queue_cur) {
queue_cycle
+
+
;
current_entry
=
0
;
cur_skipped_paths
=
0
;
queue_cur
=
queue;
while
(seek_to) {
current_entry
+
+
;
seek_to
-
-
;
queue_cur
=
queue_cur
-
>
next
;
}
show_stats();
if
(not_on_tty) {
ACTF(
"Entering queue cycle %llu."
, queue_cycle);
fflush(stdout);
}
/
*
If we had a full queue cycle with no new finds,
try
recombination strategies
next
.
*
/
if
(queued_paths
=
=
prev_queued) {
if
(use_splicing) cycles_wo_finds
+
+
;
else
use_splicing
=
1
;
}
else
cycles_wo_finds
=
0
;
prev_queued
=
queued_paths;
if
(sync_id && queue_cycle
=
=
1
&& getenv(
"AFL_IMPORT_FIRST"
))
sync_fuzzers(use_argv);
}
skipped_fuzz
=
fuzz_one(use_argv);
if
(!stop_soon && sync_id && !skipped_fuzz) {
if
(!(sync_interval_cnt
+
+
%
SYNC_INTERVAL))
sync_fuzzers(use_argv);
}
if
(!stop_soon && exit_1) stop_soon
=
2
;
if
(stop_soon)
break
;
queue_cur
=
queue_cur
-
>
next
;
current_entry
+
+
;
}
if
(queue_cur) show_stats();
/
*
If we stopped programmatically, we kill the forkserver
and
the current runner.
If we stopped manually, this
is
done by the signal handler.
*
/
if
(stop_soon
=
=
2
) {
if
(child_pid >
0
) kill(child_pid, SIGKILL);
if
(forksrv_pid >
0
) kill(forksrv_pid, SIGKILL);
}
/
*
Now that we've killed the forkserver, we wait
for
it to be able to get rusage stats.
*
/
if
(waitpid(forksrv_pid, NULL,
0
) <
=
0
) {
WARNF(
"error waitpid\n"
);
}
write_bitmap();
write_stats_file(
0
,
0
,
0
);
save_auto();
stop_fuzzing:
SAYF(CURSOR_SHOW cLRD
"\n\n+++ Testing aborted %s +++\n"
cRST,
stop_soon
=
=
2
?
"programmatically"
:
"by user"
);
/
*
Running
for
more than
30
minutes but still doing first cycle?
*
/
if
(queue_cycle
=
=
1
&& get_cur_time()
-
start_time >
30
*
60
*
1000
) {
SAYF(
"\n"
cYEL
"[!] "
cRST
"Stopped during the first cycle, results may be incomplete.\n"
" (For info on resuming, see %s/README.)\n"
, doc_path);
}
fclose(plot_file);
destroy_queue();
destroy_extras();
ck_free(target_path);
ck_free(sync_id);
alloc_report();
OKF(
"We're done here. Have a nice day!\n"
);
exit(
0
);
}
|
设置一些信号处理函数,比如说退出信号时要主动释放子进程、窗口大小调整时要跟踪变化等。
读取环境变量ASAN_OPTIONS和MSAN_OPTIONS,做一些检查
略
保存当前的命令
创建一个 banner
检查是否在tty终端上面运行。
计数logical CPU cores。
检查崩溃处理函数,确保崩溃后不会进入程序。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
|
s32 fd
=
open
(
"/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern"
, O_RDONLY);
u8 fchar;
if
(fd <
0
)
return
;
ACTF(
"Checking core_pattern..."
);
if
(read(fd, &fchar,
1
)
=
=
1
&& fchar
=
=
'|'
) {
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Hmm, your system is configured to send core dump notifications to an\n"
" external utility. This will cause issues: there will be an extended delay\n"
" between stumbling upon a crash and having this information relayed to the\n"
" fuzzer via the standard waitpid() API.\n\n"
" To avoid having crashes misinterpreted as timeouts, please log in as root\n"
" and temporarily modify /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern, like so:\n\n"
" echo core >/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern\n"
);
if
(!getenv(
"AFL_I_DONT_CARE_ABOUT_MISSING_CRASHES"
))
FATAL(
"Pipe at the beginning of 'core_pattern'"
);
}
close(fd);
|
笔者在 Ubuntu20 上跑 AFL 就会遇到这个问题,因为在默认情况下,系统会将崩溃信息通过管道发送给外部程序,由于这会影响到效率,因此通过 echo core >/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
修改保存崩溃信息的方式,将它保存为本地文件。
检查cpu
的调节器,来使得cpu
可以处于高效的运行状态。
如果用户指定了环境变量 AFL_POST_LIBRARY
,那么就会从对应的路径下加载动态库并加载 afl_postprocess
函数并保存在 post_handler
中。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
EXP_ST void setup_shm(void) {
u8
*
shm_str;
if
(!in_bitmap) memset(virgin_bits,
255
, MAP_SIZE);
memset(virgin_tmout,
255
, MAP_SIZE);
memset(virgin_crash,
255
, MAP_SIZE);
shm_id
=
shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, MAP_SIZE, IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL |
0600
);
if
(shm_id <
0
) PFATAL(
"shmget() failed"
);
atexit(remove_shm);
shm_str
=
alloc_printf(
"%d"
, shm_id);
/
*
If somebody
is
asking us to fuzz instrumented binaries
in
dumb mode,
we don
't want them to detect instrumentation, since we won'
t be sending
fork server commands. This should be replaced with better auto
-
detection
later on, perhaps?
*
/
if
(!dumb_mode) setenv(SHM_ENV_VAR, shm_str,
1
);
ck_free(shm_str);
trace_bits
=
shmat(shm_id, NULL,
0
);
if
(trace_bits
=
=
(void
*
)
-
1
) PFATAL(
"shmat() failed"
);
}
|
初始化 virgin_bits
数组用于保存后续模糊测试中覆盖的路径,virgin_tmout
保存超时的路径,virgin_crash
保存崩溃的路径。
同时建立共享内存 trace_bits
,该变量用于储存样例运行时的路径。
同时将共享内存的唯一标识符 shm_id
转为字符串后保存在环境变量 SHM_ENV_VAR
中。
初始化count_class_lookup16
数组,帮助快速归类统计路径覆盖的数量。
创建输出目录。
读取测试样例。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
static void read_testcases(void) {
struct dirent
*
*
nl;
s32 nl_cnt;
u32 i;
u8
*
fn;
/
*
Auto
-
detect non
-
in
-
place resumption attempts.
*
/
fn
=
alloc_printf(
"%s/queue"
, in_dir);
if
(!access(fn, F_OK)) in_dir
=
fn;
else
ck_free(fn);
ACTF(
"Scanning '%s'..."
, in_dir);
/
*
We use scandir()
+
alphasort() rather than readdir() because otherwise,
the ordering of test cases would vary somewhat randomly
and
would be
difficult to control.
*
/
nl_cnt
=
scandir(in_dir, &nl, NULL, alphasort);
if
(nl_cnt <
0
) {
if
(errno
=
=
ENOENT || errno
=
=
ENOTDIR)
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"The input directory does not seem to be valid - try again. The fuzzer needs\n"
" one or more test case to start with - ideally, a small file under 1 kB\n"
" or so. The cases must be stored as regular files directly in the input\n"
" directory.\n"
);
PFATAL(
"Unable to open '%s'"
, in_dir);
}
if
(shuffle_queue && nl_cnt >
1
) {
ACTF(
"Shuffling queue..."
);
shuffle_ptrs((void
*
*
)nl, nl_cnt);
}
for
(i
=
0
; i < nl_cnt; i
+
+
) {
struct stat st;
u8
*
fn
=
alloc_printf(
"%s/%s"
, in_dir, nl[i]
-
>d_name);
u8
*
dfn
=
alloc_printf(
"%s/.state/deterministic_done/%s"
, in_dir, nl[i]
-
>d_name);
u8 passed_det
=
0
;
free(nl[i]);
/
*
not
tracked
*
/
if
(lstat(fn, &st) || access(fn, R_OK))
PFATAL(
"Unable to access '%s'"
, fn);
/
*
This also takes care of .
and
..
*
/
if
(!S_ISREG(st.st_mode) || !st.st_size || strstr(fn,
"/README.testcases"
)) {
ck_free(fn);
ck_free(dfn);
continue
;
}
if
(st.st_size > MAX_FILE)
FATAL(
"Test case '%s' is too big (%s, limit is %s)"
, fn,
DMS(st.st_size), DMS(MAX_FILE));
/
*
Check
for
metadata that indicates that deterministic fuzzing
is
complete
for
this entry. We don't want to repeat deterministic
fuzzing when resuming aborted scans, because it would be pointless
and
probably very time
-
consuming.
*
/
if
(!access(dfn, F_OK)) passed_det
=
1
;
ck_free(dfn);
add_to_queue(fn, st.st_size, passed_det);
}
|
in_dir
in_dir
,如果目录下文件的数量少于等于 0 则报错shuffle_queue
就打乱顺序fn
中.
和 ..
这样的路径MAX_FILE
则终止add_to_queue
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
|
static void add_to_queue(u8
*
fname, u32
len
, u8 passed_det) {
struct queue_entry
*
q
=
ck_alloc(sizeof(struct queue_entry));
q
-
>fname
=
fname;
q
-
>
len
=
len
;
q
-
>depth
=
cur_depth
+
1
;
q
-
>passed_det
=
passed_det;
if
(q
-
>depth > max_depth) max_depth
=
q
-
>depth;
if
(queue_top) {
queue_top
-
>
next
=
q;
queue_top
=
q;
}
else
q_prev100
=
queue
=
queue_top
=
q;
queued_paths
+
+
;
pending_not_fuzzed
+
+
;
cycles_wo_finds
=
0
;
/
*
Set
next_100 pointer
for
every
100th
element (index
0
,
100
, etc) to allow faster iteration.
*
/
if
((queued_paths
-
1
)
%
100
=
=
0
&& queued_paths >
1
) {
q_prev100
-
>next_100
=
q;
q_prev100
=
q;
}
last_path_time
=
get_cur_time();
}
|
afl-fuzz
维护一个 queue_entry
的链表,该链表用来保存测试样例,每次调用 add_to_queue
都会将新样例储存到链表头部。
另外还有一个 q_prev100
也是 queue_entry
的链表,但它每 100 个测试样例保存一次。
尝试在输入目录下寻找自动生成的字典文件,调用 maybe_add_auto
将相应的字典加入到全局变量 a_extras
中,用于后续字典模式的变异当中。
在输出文件夹中创建与输入样例间的硬链接,称之为 orignal
。
如果指定了 -x
参数(字典模式),加载对应的字典到全局变量extras
当中,用于后续字典模式的变异当中。
如果指定了 resuming_fuzz
,即从输出目录当中恢复模糊测试状态,会从之前的模糊测试状态 fuzzer_stats
文件中计算中 timeout
值,保存在 exec_tmout
中。
检测输入的命令行中是否包含@@
参数,如果包含的话需要将 @@
替换成目录文件 "%s/.cur_input", out_dir
,使得模糊测试目标程序的命令完整;同时将目录文件 "%s/.cur_input"
路径保存在 out_file
当中,后续变异的内容保存在该文件路径中,用于运行测试目标文件。
如果目标程序的输入不是来源于文件而是来源于标准输入的话,则将目录文件 "%s/.cur_input"
文件打开保存在 out_fd
文件句柄中,后续将标准输入重定向到该文件中;结合 detect_file_args
函数实现了将变异的内容保存在 "%s/.cur_input"
文件中,运行目标测试文件并进行模糊测试。
检查二进制文件是否合法。
将每个测试样例作为输入去运行目标程序,检查程序是否能够正常工作:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
|
static void perform_dry_run(char
*
*
argv) {
struct queue_entry
*
q
=
queue;
u32 cal_failures
=
0
;
u8
*
skip_crashes
=
getenv(
"AFL_SKIP_CRASHES"
);
while
(q) {
u8
*
use_mem;
u8 res;
s32 fd;
u8
*
fn
=
strrchr(q
-
>fname,
'/'
)
+
1
;
ACTF(
"Attempting dry run with '%s'..."
, fn);
fd
=
open
(q
-
>fname, O_RDONLY);
if
(fd <
0
) PFATAL(
"Unable to open '%s'"
, q
-
>fname);
use_mem
=
ck_alloc_nozero(q
-
>
len
);
if
(read(fd, use_mem, q
-
>
len
) !
=
q
-
>
len
)
FATAL(
"Short read from '%s'"
, q
-
>fname);
close(fd);
res
=
calibrate_case(argv, q, use_mem,
0
,
1
);
ck_free(use_mem);
if
(stop_soon)
return
;
if
(res
=
=
crash_mode || res
=
=
FAULT_NOBITS)
SAYF(cGRA
" len = %u, map size = %u, exec speed = %llu us\n"
cRST,
q
-
>
len
, q
-
>bitmap_size, q
-
>exec_us);
......
if
(q
-
>var_behavior) WARNF(
"Instrumentation output varies across runs."
);
q
=
q
-
>
next
;
}
if
(cal_failures) {
if
(cal_failures
=
=
queued_paths)
FATAL(
"All test cases time out%s, giving up!"
,
skip_crashes ?
" or crash"
: "");
WARNF(
"Skipped %u test cases (%0.02f%%) due to timeouts%s."
, cal_failures,
((double)cal_failures)
*
100
/
queued_paths,
skip_crashes ?
" or crashes"
: "");
if
(cal_failures
*
5
> queued_paths)
WARNF(cLRD
"High percentage of rejected test cases, check settings!"
);
}
OKF(
"All test cases processed."
);
}
|
对每个测试样例使用 calibrate_case
进行测试,并返回运行结果,然后处理其中异常的情况,比如说程序崩溃或运行超时等。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
|
static u8 calibrate_case(char
*
*
argv, struct queue_entry
*
q, u8
*
use_mem,
u32 handicap, u8 from_queue) {
static u8 first_trace[MAP_SIZE];
u8 fault
=
0
, new_bits
=
0
, var_detected
=
0
, hnb
=
0
,
first_run
=
(q
-
>exec_cksum
=
=
0
);
u64 start_us, stop_us;
s32 old_sc
=
stage_cur, old_sm
=
stage_max;
u32 use_tmout
=
exec_tmout;
u8
*
old_sn
=
stage_name;
/
*
Be a bit more generous about timeouts when resuming sessions,
or
when
trying to calibrate already
-
added finds. This helps avoid trouble due
to intermittent latency.
*
/
if
(!from_queue || resuming_fuzz)
use_tmout
=
MAX
(exec_tmout
+
CAL_TMOUT_ADD,
exec_tmout
*
CAL_TMOUT_PERC
/
100
);
q
-
>cal_failed
+
+
;
stage_name
=
"calibration"
;
stage_max
=
fast_cal ?
3
: CAL_CYCLES;
/
*
Make sure the forkserver
is
up before we do anything,
and
let's
not
count its spin
-
up time toward binary calibration.
*
/
if
(dumb_mode !
=
1
&& !no_forkserver && !forksrv_pid)
init_forkserver(argv);
if
(q
-
>exec_cksum) {
memcpy(first_trace, trace_bits, MAP_SIZE);
hnb
=
has_new_bits(virgin_bits);
if
(hnb > new_bits) new_bits
=
hnb;
}
start_us
=
get_cur_time_us();
for
(stage_cur
=
0
; stage_cur < stage_max; stage_cur
+
+
) {
u32 cksum;
if
(!first_run && !(stage_cur
%
stats_update_freq)) show_stats();
write_to_testcase(use_mem, q
-
>
len
);
fault
=
run_target(argv, use_tmout);
/
*
stop_soon
is
set
by the handler
for
Ctrl
+
C. When it's pressed,
we want to bail out quickly.
*
/
if
(stop_soon || fault !
=
crash_mode) goto abort_calibration;
if
(!dumb_mode && !stage_cur && !count_bytes(trace_bits)) {
fault
=
FAULT_NOINST;
goto abort_calibration;
}
cksum
=
hash32(trace_bits, MAP_SIZE, HASH_CONST);
if
(q
-
>exec_cksum !
=
cksum) {
hnb
=
has_new_bits(virgin_bits);
if
(hnb > new_bits) new_bits
=
hnb;
if
(q
-
>exec_cksum) {
u32 i;
for
(i
=
0
; i < MAP_SIZE; i
+
+
) {
if
(!var_bytes[i] && first_trace[i] !
=
trace_bits[i]) {
var_bytes[i]
=
1
;
stage_max
=
CAL_CYCLES_LONG;
}
}
var_detected
=
1
;
}
else
{
q
-
>exec_cksum
=
cksum;
memcpy(first_trace, trace_bits, MAP_SIZE);
}
}
}
stop_us
=
get_cur_time_us();
total_cal_us
+
=
stop_us
-
start_us;
total_cal_cycles
+
=
stage_max;
/
*
OK, let's collect some stats about the performance of this test case.
This
is
used
for
fuzzing air time calculations
in
calculate_score().
*
/
q
-
>exec_us
=
(stop_us
-
start_us)
/
stage_max;
q
-
>bitmap_size
=
count_bytes(trace_bits);
q
-
>handicap
=
handicap;
q
-
>cal_failed
=
0
;
total_bitmap_size
+
=
q
-
>bitmap_size;
total_bitmap_entries
+
+
;
update_bitmap_score(q);
/
*
If this case didn't result
in
new output
from
the instrumentation, tell
parent. This
is
a non
-
critical problem, but something to warn the user
about.
*
/
if
(!dumb_mode && first_run && !fault && !new_bits) fault
=
FAULT_NOBITS;
abort_calibration:
if
(new_bits
=
=
2
&& !q
-
>has_new_cov) {
q
-
>has_new_cov
=
1
;
queued_with_cov
+
+
;
}
/
*
Mark variable paths.
*
/
if
(var_detected) {
var_byte_count
=
count_bytes(var_bytes);
if
(!q
-
>var_behavior) {
mark_as_variable(q);
queued_variable
+
+
;
}
}
stage_name
=
old_sn;
stage_cur
=
old_sc;
stage_max
=
old_sm;
if
(!first_run) show_stats();
return
fault;
}
|
该函数用以对样例进行测试,在后续的测试过程中也会反复调用。此处,其主要的工作是:
first_run
use_tmout
init_forkserver
初始化 fork server
fork server 是 AFL 中一个重要的机制。
afl-fuzz
主动建立一个子进程为 fork server
,而模糊测试则是通过 fork server
调用 fork 建立子进程来进行测试。
参考在源代码注释中的这篇文章可以有更加深入的理解:
https://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/10/fuzzing-binaries-without-execve.html
之所以需要设计它,笔者在这里给出一个比较概括的理由:
一般来说,如果我们想要测试输入样例,就需要用 fork+execve
去执行相关的二进制程序,但是执行程序是需要加载代码、动态库、符号解析等各种耗时的行为,这会让 AFL 不够效率。
但是这个过程其实是存在浪费的,可以注意到,如果我们要对相同的二进制程序进行多次不同的输入样本进行测试,那按照原本的操作,我们应该多次执行 fork+execve
,而浪费就出现在这,因为我们明明已经加载好了一切,却又要因此重复加载释放。
因此 fork server
的设计主要就是为了解决这个浪费。它通过向代码中进行插桩的方式,使得在二进制程序中去建立一个 fork server
(对,它实际上是由目标程序去建立的),然后这个 fork server
会在完成一切初始化后,停止在某一个地方(往往设定在 main
函数)等待 fuzzer 去喊开始执行。
一旦 fuzzer 喊了开始,就会由这个 fork server
去调用 fork
然后往下执行。而我们知道,fork
由于写时复制的机制存在,它其实并没有过多的开销,可以完全继承原有的所有上下文信息,从而避开了多次 execve
的加载开销。
摘抄一段这部分插桩的内容:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
__afl_forkserver:
/
*
Phone home
and
tell the parent that we're OK.
*
/
pushl $
4
/
*
length
*
/
pushl $__afl_temp
/
*
data
*
/
pushl $
199
/
*
file
desc
*
/
call write
addl $
12
,
%
esp
__afl_fork_wait_loop:
/
*
Wait
for
parent by reading
from
the pipe. This will block until
the parent sends us something. Abort
if
read fails.
*
/
pushl $
4
/
*
length
*
/
pushl $__afl_temp
/
*
data
*
/
pushl $
198
/
*
file
desc
*
/
call read
addl $
12
,
%
esp
cmpl $
4
,
%
eax
jne __afl_die
/
*
Once woken up, create a clone of our process.
*
/
call fork
cmpl $
0
,
%
eax
jl __afl_die
je __afl_fork_resume
/
*
In parent process: write PID to pipe, then wait
for
child.
Parent will handle timeouts
and
SIGKILL the child as needed.
*
/
movl
%
eax, __afl_fork_pid
pushl $
4
/
*
length
*
/
pushl $__afl_fork_pid
/
*
data
*
/
pushl $
199
/
*
file
desc
*
/
call write
addl $
12
,
%
esp
pushl $
2
/
*
WUNTRACED
*
/
pushl $__afl_temp
/
*
status
*
/
pushl __afl_fork_pid
/
*
PID
*
/
call waitpid
addl $
12
,
%
esp
cmpl $
0
,
%
eax
jle __afl_die
/
*
Relay wait status to pipe, then loop back.
*
/
pushl $
4
/
*
length
*
/
pushl $__afl_temp
/
*
data
*
/
pushl $
199
/
*
file
desc
*
/
call write
addl $
12
,
%
esp
jmp __afl_fork_wait_loop
__afl_fork_resume:
/
*
In child process: close fds, resume execution.
*
/
pushl $
198
call close
pushl $
199
call close
addl $
8
,
%
esp
ret
|
fork server
主要是通过管道和 afl-fuzz 中的 fork server
进行通信的,但他们其实不做过多的事情,往往只是通知一下程序运行的状态。因为真正的反馈信息,包括路径的发现等这部分功能是通过共享内存去实现的,它们不需要用 fork server
这种效率较低的方案去记录数据。
剩下的就是关闭一些不需要的文件或管道了,代码姑且贴在这里,以备未来有需要时可以现查:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
|
EXP_ST void init_forkserver(char
*
*
argv) {
static struct itimerval it;
int
st_pipe[
2
], ctl_pipe[
2
];
int
status;
s32 rlen;
ACTF(
"Spinning up the fork server..."
);
if
(pipe(st_pipe) || pipe(ctl_pipe)) PFATAL(
"pipe() failed"
);
forksrv_pid
=
fork();
if
(forksrv_pid <
0
) PFATAL(
"fork() failed"
);
if
(!forksrv_pid) {
struct rlimit r;
/
*
Umpf. On OpenBSD, the default fd limit
for
root users
is
set
to
soft
128.
Let's
try
to fix that...
*
/
if
(!getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &r) && r.rlim_cur < FORKSRV_FD
+
2
) {
r.rlim_cur
=
FORKSRV_FD
+
2
;
setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &r);
/
*
Ignore errors
*
/
}
if
(mem_limit) {
r.rlim_max
=
r.rlim_cur
=
((rlim_t)mem_limit) <<
20
;
#ifdef RLIMIT_AS
setrlimit(RLIMIT_AS, &r);
/
*
Ignore errors
*
/
#else
/
*
This takes care of OpenBSD, which doesn't have RLIMIT_AS, but
according to reliable sources, RLIMIT_DATA covers anonymous
maps
-
so we should be getting good protection against OOM bugs.
*
/
setrlimit(RLIMIT_DATA, &r);
/
*
Ignore errors
*
/
#endif /* ^RLIMIT_AS */
}
/
*
Dumping cores
is
slow
and
can lead to anomalies
if
SIGKILL
is
delivered
before the dump
is
complete.
*
/
r.rlim_max
=
r.rlim_cur
=
0
;
setrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE, &r);
/
*
Ignore errors
*
/
/
*
Isolate the process
and
configure standard descriptors. If out_file
is
specified, stdin
is
/
dev
/
null; otherwise, out_fd
is
cloned instead.
*
/
setsid();
dup2(dev_null_fd,
1
);
dup2(dev_null_fd,
2
);
if
(out_file) {
dup2(dev_null_fd,
0
);
}
else
{
dup2(out_fd,
0
);
close(out_fd);
}
/
*
Set
up control
and
status pipes, close the unneeded original fds.
*
/
if
(dup2(ctl_pipe[
0
], FORKSRV_FD) <
0
) PFATAL(
"dup2() failed"
);
if
(dup2(st_pipe[
1
], FORKSRV_FD
+
1
) <
0
) PFATAL(
"dup2() failed"
);
close(ctl_pipe[
0
]);
close(ctl_pipe[
1
]);
close(st_pipe[
0
]);
close(st_pipe[
1
]);
close(out_dir_fd);
close(dev_null_fd);
close(dev_urandom_fd);
close(fileno(plot_file));
/
*
This should improve performance a bit, since it stops the linker
from
doing extra work post
-
fork().
*
/
if
(!getenv(
"LD_BIND_LAZY"
)) setenv(
"LD_BIND_NOW"
,
"1"
,
0
);
/
*
Set
sane defaults
for
ASAN
if
nothing
else
specified.
*
/
setenv(
"ASAN_OPTIONS"
,
"abort_on_error=1:"
"detect_leaks=0:"
"symbolize=0:"
"allocator_may_return_null=1"
,
0
);
/
*
MSAN
is
tricky, because it doesn't support abort_on_error
=
1
at this
point. So, we do this
in
a very hacky way.
*
/
setenv(
"MSAN_OPTIONS"
,
"exit_code="
STRINGIFY(MSAN_ERROR)
":"
"symbolize=0:"
"abort_on_error=1:"
"allocator_may_return_null=1:"
"msan_track_origins=0"
,
0
);
execv(target_path, argv);
/
*
Use a distinctive bitmap signature to tell the parent about execv()
falling through.
*
/
*
(u32
*
)trace_bits
=
EXEC_FAIL_SIG;
exit(
0
);
}
/
*
Close the unneeded endpoints.
*
/
close(ctl_pipe[
0
]);
close(st_pipe[
1
]);
fsrv_ctl_fd
=
ctl_pipe[
1
];
fsrv_st_fd
=
st_pipe[
0
];
/
*
Wait
for
the fork server to come up, but don't wait too
long
.
*
/
it.it_value.tv_sec
=
((exec_tmout
*
FORK_WAIT_MULT)
/
1000
);
it.it_value.tv_usec
=
((exec_tmout
*
FORK_WAIT_MULT)
%
1000
)
*
1000
;
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &it, NULL);
rlen
=
read(fsrv_st_fd, &status,
4
);
it.it_value.tv_sec
=
0
;
it.it_value.tv_usec
=
0
;
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &it, NULL);
/
*
If we have a four
-
byte
"hello"
message
from
the server, we're
all
set
.
Otherwise,
try
to figure out what went wrong.
*
/
if
(rlen
=
=
4
) {
OKF(
"All right - fork server is up."
);
return
;
}
if
(child_timed_out)
FATAL(
"Timeout while initializing fork server (adjusting -t may help)"
);
if
(waitpid(forksrv_pid, &status,
0
) <
=
0
)
PFATAL(
"waitpid() failed"
);
if
(WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
if
(mem_limit && mem_limit <
500
&& uses_asan) {
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Whoops, the target binary crashed suddenly, before receiving any input\n"
" from the fuzzer! Since it seems to be built with ASAN and you have a\n"
" restrictive memory limit configured, this is expected; please read\n"
" %s/notes_for_asan.txt for help.\n"
, doc_path);
}
else
if
(!mem_limit) {
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Whoops, the target binary crashed suddenly, before receiving any input\n"
" from the fuzzer! There are several probable explanations:\n\n"
" - The binary is just buggy and explodes entirely on its own. If so, you\n"
" need to fix the underlying problem or find a better replacement.\n\n"
#ifdef __APPLE__
" - On MacOS X, the semantics of fork() syscalls are non-standard and may\n"
" break afl-fuzz performance optimizations when running platform-specific\n"
" targets. To fix this, set AFL_NO_FORKSRV=1 in the environment.\n\n"
#endif /* __APPLE__ */
" - Less likely, there is a horrible bug in the fuzzer. If other options\n"
" fail, poke <lcamtuf@coredump.cx> for troubleshooting tips.\n"
);
}
else
{
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Whoops, the target binary crashed suddenly, before receiving any input\n"
" from the fuzzer! There are several probable explanations:\n\n"
" - The current memory limit (%s) is too restrictive, causing the\n"
" target to hit an OOM condition in the dynamic linker. Try bumping up\n"
" the limit with the -m setting in the command line. A simple way confirm\n"
" this diagnosis would be:\n\n"
#ifdef RLIMIT_AS
" ( ulimit -Sv $[%llu << 10]; /path/to/fuzzed_app )\n\n"
#else
" ( ulimit -Sd $[%llu << 10]; /path/to/fuzzed_app )\n\n"
#endif /* ^RLIMIT_AS */
" Tip: you can use http://jwilk.net/software/recidivm to quickly\n"
" estimate the required amount of virtual memory for the binary.\n\n"
" - The binary is just buggy and explodes entirely on its own. If so, you\n"
" need to fix the underlying problem or find a better replacement.\n\n"
#ifdef __APPLE__
" - On MacOS X, the semantics of fork() syscalls are non-standard and may\n"
" break afl-fuzz performance optimizations when running platform-specific\n"
" targets. To fix this, set AFL_NO_FORKSRV=1 in the environment.\n\n"
#endif /* __APPLE__ */
" - Less likely, there is a horrible bug in the fuzzer. If other options\n"
" fail, poke <lcamtuf@coredump.cx> for troubleshooting tips.\n"
,
DMS(mem_limit <<
20
), mem_limit
-
1
);
}
FATAL(
"Fork server crashed with signal %d"
, WTERMSIG(status));
}
if
(
*
(u32
*
)trace_bits
=
=
EXEC_FAIL_SIG)
FATAL(
"Unable to execute target application ('%s')"
, argv[
0
]);
if
(mem_limit && mem_limit <
500
&& uses_asan) {
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Hmm, looks like the target binary terminated before we could complete a\n"
" handshake with the injected code. Since it seems to be built with ASAN and\n"
" you have a restrictive memory limit configured, this is expected; please\n"
" read %s/notes_for_asan.txt for help.\n"
, doc_path);
}
else
if
(!mem_limit) {
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Hmm, looks like the target binary terminated before we could complete a\n"
" handshake with the injected code. Perhaps there is a horrible bug in the\n"
" fuzzer. Poke <lcamtuf@coredump.cx> for troubleshooting tips.\n"
);
}
else
{
SAYF(
"\n"
cLRD
"[-] "
cRST
"Hmm, looks like the target binary terminated before we could complete a\n"
" handshake with the injected code. There are %s probable explanations:\n\n"
"%s"
" - The current memory limit (%s) is too restrictive, causing an OOM\n"
" fault in the dynamic linker. This can be fixed with the -m option. A\n"
" simple way to confirm the diagnosis may be:\n\n"
#ifdef RLIMIT_AS
" ( ulimit -Sv $[%llu << 10]; /path/to/fuzzed_app )\n\n"
#else
" ( ulimit -Sd $[%llu << 10]; /path/to/fuzzed_app )\n\n"
#endif /* ^RLIMIT_AS */
" Tip: you can use http://jwilk.net/software/recidivm to quickly\n"
" estimate the required amount of virtual memory for the binary.\n\n"
" - Less likely, there is a horrible bug in the fuzzer. If other options\n"
" fail, poke <lcamtuf@coredump.cx> for troubleshooting tips.\n"
,
getenv(DEFER_ENV_VAR) ?
"three"
:
"two"
,
getenv(DEFER_ENV_VAR) ?
" - You are using deferred forkserver, but __AFL_INIT() is never\n"
" reached before the program terminates.\n\n"
: "",
DMS(mem_limit <<
20
), mem_limit
-
1
);
}
FATAL(
"Fork server handshake failed"
);
}
|
将运行过的种子根据运行的效果进行排序,后续模糊测试根据排序的结果来挑选样例进行模糊测试。
初始化 UI
。
如果是恢复运行,则调用该函数来寻找到对应的样例的位置。
更新统计信息文件以进行无人值守的监视。
保存自动提取的 token
,用于后续字典模式的 fuzz
。
cull_queue
来优化队列queue_cur
为空,代表所有queue都被执行完一轮
show_stats
skipped_fuzz = fuzz_one(use_argv)
来对queue_cur进行一次测试
queue_cur = queue_cur->next;current_entry++;
,开始测试下一个queue
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
|
while
(
1
) {
u8 skipped_fuzz;
cull_queue();
if
(!queue_cur) {
queue_cycle
+
+
;
current_entry
=
0
;
cur_skipped_paths
=
0
;
queue_cur
=
queue;
while
(seek_to) {
current_entry
+
+
;
seek_to
-
-
;
queue_cur
=
queue_cur
-
>
next
;
}
show_stats();
if
(not_on_tty) {
ACTF(
"Entering queue cycle %llu."
, queue_cycle);
fflush(stdout);
}
/
*
If we had a full queue cycle with no new finds,
try
recombination strategies
next
.
*
/
if
(queued_paths
=
=
prev_queued) {
if
(use_splicing) cycles_wo_finds
+
+
;
else
use_splicing
=
1
;
}
else
cycles_wo_finds
=
0
;
prev_queued
=
queued_paths;
if
(sync_id && queue_cycle
=
=
1
&& getenv(
"AFL_IMPORT_FIRST"
))
sync_fuzzers(use_argv);
}
skipped_fuzz
=
fuzz_one(use_argv);
if
(!stop_soon && sync_id && !skipped_fuzz) {
if
(!(sync_interval_cnt
+
+
%
SYNC_INTERVAL))
sync_fuzzers(use_argv);
}
if
(!stop_soon && exit_1) stop_soon
=
2
;
if
(stop_soon)
break
;
queue_cur
=
queue_cur
-
>
next
;
current_entry
+
+
;
}
|
从测试样例的队列中取出 current_entry
进行测试,成功则返回 0 ,否则返回 1。这里主要是对该函数主要内容进行记录,不做细节的代码分析。
queue_cur
并映射到 orig_in
和 in_buf
out_buf
queue_cur->cal_failed < CAL_CHANCES
且 queue_cur->cal_failed >0
,则调用 calibrate_case
trim_case
修剪样例out_buf
缩减的思路是这样的:如果对一个样本进行缩减后,它所覆盖的路径并未发生变化,那么就说明缩减的这部分内容是可有可无的,因此可以删除。
具体策略如下:
stage_name
为 tmp
,该变量仅用来标识本次缩减所使用的策略len_p2
,其值是大于等于 q->len
的第一个2的幂次。len_p2/16
为 remove_len
作为起始步长。remove_len
小于终止步长 len_p2/1024
, 每轮循环步长会除2。
run_target
运行样例,trim_execs
计数器加一q->len
中减去 remove_len
个字节,并由此重新计算出一个 len_p2
,这里注意一下while (remove_len >= MAX(len_p2 / TRIM_END_STEPS, TRIM_MIN_BYTES))
in_buf+remove_pos+remove_len
到最后的字节,前移到 in_buf+remove_pos
处,等于删除了 remove_pos
向后的 remove_len
个字节。needs_write
为 0,则设置其为 1,并保存当前 trace_bits
到 clean_trace
中。remove_pos
加上 remove_len
q->fname
,创建一个新的 q->fname
,将 in_buf
里的内容写入,然后用 clean_trace
恢复 trace_bits
的值。update_bitmap_score
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
static u8 trim_case(char
*
*
argv, struct queue_entry
*
q, u8
*
in_buf) {
static u8 tmp[
64
];
static u8 clean_trace[MAP_SIZE];
u8 needs_write
=
0
, fault
=
0
;
u32 trim_exec
=
0
;
u32 remove_len;
u32 len_p2;
/
*
Although the trimmer will be less useful when variable behavior
is
detected, it will still work to some extent, so we don't check
for
this.
*
/
if
(q
-
>
len
<
5
)
return
0
;
stage_name
=
tmp;
bytes_trim_in
+
=
q
-
>
len
;
/
*
Select initial chunk
len
, starting with large steps.
*
/
len_p2
=
next_p2(q
-
>
len
);
remove_len
=
MAX
(len_p2
/
TRIM_START_STEPS, TRIM_MIN_BYTES);
/
*
Continue until the number of steps gets too high
or
the stepover
gets too small.
*
/
while
(remove_len >
=
MAX
(len_p2
/
TRIM_END_STEPS, TRIM_MIN_BYTES)) {
u32 remove_pos
=
remove_len;
sprintf(tmp,
"trim %s/%s"
, DI(remove_len), DI(remove_len));
stage_cur
=
0
;
stage_max
=
q
-
>
len
/
remove_len;
while
(remove_pos < q
-
>
len
) {
u32 trim_avail
=
MIN
(remove_len, q
-
>
len
-
remove_pos);
u32 cksum;
write_with_gap(in_buf, q
-
>
len
, remove_pos, trim_avail);
fault
=
run_target(argv, exec_tmout);
trim_execs
+
+
;
if
(stop_soon || fault
=
=
FAULT_ERROR) goto abort_trimming;
/
*
Note that we don't keep track of crashes
or
hangs here; maybe TODO?
*
/
cksum
=
hash32(trace_bits, MAP_SIZE, HASH_CONST);
/
*
If the deletion had no impact on the trace, make it permanent. This
isn
't perfect for variable-path inputs, but we'
re just making a
best
-
effort
pass
, so it's
not
a big deal
if
we end up with false
negatives every now
and
then.
*
/
if
(cksum
=
=
q
-
>exec_cksum) {
u32 move_tail
=
q
-
>
len
-
remove_pos
-
trim_avail;
q
-
>
len
-
=
trim_avail;
len_p2
=
next_p2(q
-
>
len
);
memmove(in_buf
+
remove_pos, in_buf
+
remove_pos
+
trim_avail,
move_tail);
/
*
Let's save a clean trace, which will be needed by
update_bitmap_score once we're done with the trimming stuff.
*
/
if
(!needs_write) {
needs_write
=
1
;
memcpy(clean_trace, trace_bits, MAP_SIZE);
}
}
else
remove_pos
+
=
remove_len;
/
*
Since this can be slow, update the screen every now
and
then.
*
/
if
(!(trim_exec
+
+
%
stats_update_freq)) show_stats();
stage_cur
+
+
;
}
remove_len >>
=
1
;
}
/
*
If we have made changes to in_buf, we also need to update the on
-
disk
version of the test case.
*
/
if
(needs_write) {
s32 fd;
unlink(q
-
>fname);
/
*
ignore errors
*
/
fd
=
open
(q
-
>fname, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL,
0600
);
if
(fd <
0
) PFATAL(
"Unable to create '%s'"
, q
-
>fname);
ck_write(fd, in_buf, q
-
>
len
, q
-
>fname);
close(fd);
memcpy(trace_bits, clean_trace, MAP_SIZE);
update_bitmap_score(q);
}
abort_trimming:
bytes_trim_out
+
=
q
-
>
len
;
return
fault;
}
|
calculate_score(queue_cur)
skip_deterministic
为1,或者 queue_cur
被 fuzz 过,或者 queue_cur
的 passed_det
为1,则跳转去 havoc_stage
阶段 这个阶段读起来感觉比较抽象。首先定义了这么一个宏:
1
2
3
4
5
|
#define FLIP_BIT(_ar, _b) do { \
u8
*
_arf
=
(u8
*
)(_ar); \
u32 _bf
=
(_b); \
_arf[(_bf) >>
3
] ^
=
(
128
>> ((_bf) &
7
)); \
}
while
(
0
)
|
这个宏的操作是对一个 bit 进行反转。
而接下来首先有一个循环:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
stage_short
=
"flip1"
;
stage_max
=
len
<<
3
;
stage_name
=
"bitflip 1/1"
;
stage_val_type
=
STAGE_VAL_NONE;
orig_hit_cnt
=
queued_paths
+
unique_crashes;
prev_cksum
=
queue_cur
-
>exec_cksum;
for
(stage_cur
=
0
; stage_cur < stage_max; stage_cur
+
+
) {
stage_cur_byte
=
stage_cur >>
3
;
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, stage_cur);
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, stage_cur);
......
|
stage_max
是输入的总 bit 数,然后分别对每个 bit 进行翻转后用 common_fuzz_stuff
进行测试,然后再将其翻转回来。
而如果对某个字节的最后一个 bit 翻转后测试,发现路径并未增加,就能够将其认为是一个 token
。
maybe_add_auto
添加到a_extras
数组里。stage_finds[STAGE_FLIP1]
的值加上在整个FLIP_BIT中新发现的路径和Crash总和stage_cycles[STAGE_FLIP1]
的值加上在整个FLIP_BIT中执行的target次数stage_max
bitflip 2/1
,原理和之前一样,只是这次是连续翻转相邻的两位。然后在后面的一个循环中又做类似的事,但每次会翻转两个 bit:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
stage_name
=
"bitflip 2/1"
;
stage_short
=
"flip2"
;
stage_max
=
(
len
<<
3
)
-
1
;
orig_hit_cnt
=
new_hit_cnt;
for
(stage_cur
=
0
; stage_cur < stage_max; stage_cur
+
+
) {
stage_cur_byte
=
stage_cur >>
3
;
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, stage_cur);
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, stage_cur
+
1
);
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, stage_cur);
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, stage_cur
+
1
);
}
|
stage_finds[STAGE_FLIP2]和stage_cycles[STAGE_FLIP2]
里。bitflip 4/1
,翻转连续的四位并记录。Effector map
bitflip 8/8
的阶段,这个阶段就是对每个字节的所有 bit 都进行翻转,然后用 common_fuzz_stuff
进行测试effector map
中标记为1,即“有效”的,否则标记为 0,即“无效”的。然后进入 bitflip 16/8
部分,按对每两个字节进行一次翻转然后测试:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
for
(i
=
0
; i <
len
-
1
; i
+
+
) {
/
*
Let's consult the effector
map
...
*
/
if
(!eff_map[EFF_APOS(i)] && !eff_map[EFF_APOS(i
+
1
)]) {
stage_max
-
-
;
continue
;
}
stage_cur_byte
=
i;
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
i) ^
=
0xFFFF
;
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
stage_cur
+
+
;
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
i) ^
=
0xFFFF
;
}
|
最后是 bitflip 32/8
阶段,每 4 个字节进行翻转然后测试:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
|
stage_name
=
"bitflip 32/8"
;
stage_short
=
"flip32"
;
stage_cur
=
0
;
stage_max
=
len
-
3
;
orig_hit_cnt
=
new_hit_cnt;
for
(i
=
0
; i <
len
-
3
; i
+
+
) {
/
*
Let's consult the effector
map
...
*
/
if
(!eff_map[EFF_APOS(i)] && !eff_map[EFF_APOS(i
+
1
)] &&
!eff_map[EFF_APOS(i
+
2
)] && !eff_map[EFF_APOS(i
+
3
)]) {
stage_max
-
-
;
continue
;
}
stage_cur_byte
=
i;
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
i) ^
=
0xFFFFFFFF
;
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
stage_cur
+
+
;
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
i) ^
=
0xFFFFFFFF
;
}
|
config.h
中的宏 ARITH_MAX
定义,默认为 35。所以,对目标整数会进行+1, +2, …, +35, -1, -2, …, -35 的变异。特别地,由于整数存在大端序和小端序两种表示方式,AFL会贴心地对这两种整数表示方式都进行变异。arithmetic
变异。第一种情况就是前面提到的 effector map :如果一个整数的所有 bytes 都被判断为“无效”,那么就跳过对整数的变异。第二种情况是之前 bitflip 已经生成过的变异:如果加/减某个数后,其效果与之前的某种bitflip相同,那么这次变异肯定在上一个阶段已经执行过了,此次便不会再执行。此处展示 arith 8/8 部分代码:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
|
stage_name
=
"arith 8/8"
;
stage_short
=
"arith8"
;
stage_cur
=
0
;
stage_max
=
2
*
len
*
ARITH_MAX;
stage_val_type
=
STAGE_VAL_LE;
orig_hit_cnt
=
new_hit_cnt;
for
(i
=
0
; i <
len
; i
+
+
) {
u8 orig
=
out_buf[i];
/
*
Let's consult the effector
map
...
*
/
if
(!eff_map[EFF_APOS(i)]) {
stage_max
-
=
2
*
ARITH_MAX;
continue
;
}
stage_cur_byte
=
i;
for
(j
=
1
; j <
=
ARITH_MAX; j
+
+
) {
u8 r
=
orig ^ (orig
+
j);
/
*
Do arithmetic operations only
if
the result couldn't be a product
of a bitflip.
*
/
if
(!could_be_bitflip(r)) {
stage_cur_val
=
j;
out_buf[i]
=
orig
+
j;
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
stage_cur
+
+
;
}
else
stage_max
-
-
;
r
=
orig ^ (orig
-
j);
if
(!could_be_bitflip(r)) {
stage_cur_val
=
-
j;
out_buf[i]
=
orig
-
j;
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
stage_cur
+
+
;
}
else
stage_max
-
-
;
out_buf[i]
=
orig;
}
}
new_hit_cnt
=
queued_paths
+
unique_crashes;
stage_finds[STAGE_ARITH8]
+
=
new_hit_cnt
-
orig_hit_cnt;
stage_cycles[STAGE_ARITH8]
+
=
stage_max;
|
interesting values
是AFL预设的一些比较特殊的数,这些数的定义在config.h文件中:
1
2
3
|
static s8 interesting_8[]
=
{ INTERESTING_8 };
static s16 interesting_16[]
=
{ INTERESTING_8, INTERESTING_16 };
static s32 interesting_32[]
=
{ INTERESTING_8, INTERESTING_16, INTERESTING_32 };
|
effector map
仍然会用于判断是否需要变异;此外,如果某个interesting value
,是可以通过 bitflip
或者 arithmetic
变异达到,那么这样的重复性变异也是会跳过的。此处给出 interest 8/8
部分代码:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
|
stage_name
=
"interest 8/8"
;
stage_short
=
"int8"
;
stage_cur
=
0
;
stage_max
=
len
*
sizeof(interesting_8);
stage_val_type
=
STAGE_VAL_LE;
orig_hit_cnt
=
new_hit_cnt;
/
*
Setting
8
-
bit integers.
*
/
for
(i
=
0
; i <
len
; i
+
+
) {
u8 orig
=
out_buf[i];
/
*
Let's consult the effector
map
...
*
/
if
(!eff_map[EFF_APOS(i)]) {
stage_max
-
=
sizeof(interesting_8);
continue
;
}
stage_cur_byte
=
i;
for
(j
=
0
; j < sizeof(interesting_8); j
+
+
) {
/
*
Skip
if
the value could be a product of bitflips
or
arithmetics.
*
/
if
(could_be_bitflip(orig ^ (u8)interesting_8[j]) ||
could_be_arith(orig, (u8)interesting_8[j],
1
)) {
stage_max
-
-
;
continue
;
}
stage_cur_val
=
interesting_8[j];
out_buf[i]
=
interesting_8[j];
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
out_buf[i]
=
orig;
stage_cur
+
+
;
}
}
new_hit_cnt
=
queued_paths
+
unique_crashes;
stage_finds[STAGE_INTEREST8]
+
=
new_hit_cnt
-
orig_hit_cnt;
stage_cycles[STAGE_INTEREST8]
+
=
stage_max;
|
-x
选项指定一个词典,如果没有则跳过前两个阶段extras_cnt * len
extras_cnt * len
auto extras
阶段stage_max
为MIN(a_extras_cnt, USE_AUTO_EXTRAS) * len
此处给出 auto extras (over)
部分的源代码:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
|
if
(!a_extras_cnt) goto skip_extras;
stage_name
=
"auto extras (over)"
;
stage_short
=
"ext_AO"
;
stage_cur
=
0
;
stage_max
=
MIN
(a_extras_cnt, USE_AUTO_EXTRAS)
*
len
;
stage_val_type
=
STAGE_VAL_NONE;
orig_hit_cnt
=
new_hit_cnt;
for
(i
=
0
; i <
len
; i
+
+
) {
u32 last_len
=
0
;
stage_cur_byte
=
i;
for
(j
=
0
; j <
MIN
(a_extras_cnt, USE_AUTO_EXTRAS); j
+
+
) {
/
*
See the comment
in
the earlier code; extras are
sorted
by size.
*
/
if
(a_extras[j].
len
>
len
-
i ||
!memcmp(a_extras[j].data, out_buf
+
i, a_extras[j].
len
) ||
!memchr(eff_map
+
EFF_APOS(i),
1
, EFF_SPAN_ALEN(i, a_extras[j].
len
))) {
stage_max
-
-
;
continue
;
}
last_len
=
a_extras[j].
len
;
memcpy(out_buf
+
i, a_extras[j].data, last_len);
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf,
len
)) goto abandon_entry;
stage_cur
+
+
;
}
/
*
Restore
all
the clobbered memory.
*
/
memcpy(out_buf
+
i, in_buf
+
i, last_len);
}
new_hit_cnt
=
queued_paths
+
unique_crashes;
stage_finds[STAGE_EXTRAS_AO]
+
=
new_hit_cnt
-
orig_hit_cnt;
stage_cycles[STAGE_EXTRAS_AO]
+
=
stage_max;
|
该部分使用一个巨大的 switch ,通过随机数进行跳转,并在每个分支中使用随机数来完成随机性的行为:
use_stacking = 1 << (1 + UR(HAVOC_STACK_POW2))
common_fuzz_stuff
进行测试stage_max
次
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
|
for
(stage_cur
=
0
; stage_cur < stage_max; stage_cur
+
+
) {
u32 use_stacking
=
1
<< (
1
+
UR(HAVOC_STACK_POW2));
stage_cur_val
=
use_stacking;
for
(i
=
0
; i < use_stacking; i
+
+
) {
switch (UR(
15
+
((extras_cnt
+
a_extras_cnt) ?
2
:
0
))) {
case
0
:
/
*
Flip a single bit somewhere. Spooky!
*
/
FLIP_BIT(out_buf, UR(temp_len <<
3
));
break
;
case
1
:
/
*
Set
byte to interesting value.
*
/
out_buf[UR(temp_len)]
=
interesting_8[UR(sizeof(interesting_8))];
break
;
case
2
:
/
*
Set
word to interesting value, randomly choosing endian.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
2
)
break
;
if
(UR(
2
)) {
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
UR(temp_len
-
1
))
=
interesting_16[UR(sizeof(interesting_16) >>
1
)];
}
else
{
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
UR(temp_len
-
1
))
=
SWAP16(
interesting_16[UR(sizeof(interesting_16) >>
1
)]);
}
break
;
case
3
:
/
*
Set
dword to interesting value, randomly choosing endian.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
4
)
break
;
if
(UR(
2
)) {
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
UR(temp_len
-
3
))
=
interesting_32[UR(sizeof(interesting_32) >>
2
)];
}
else
{
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
UR(temp_len
-
3
))
=
SWAP32(
interesting_32[UR(sizeof(interesting_32) >>
2
)]);
}
break
;
case
4
:
/
*
Randomly subtract
from
byte.
*
/
out_buf[UR(temp_len)]
-
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
break
;
case
5
:
/
*
Randomly add to byte.
*
/
out_buf[UR(temp_len)]
+
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
break
;
case
6
:
/
*
Randomly subtract
from
word, random endian.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
2
)
break
;
if
(UR(
2
)) {
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
1
);
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
-
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
}
else
{
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
1
);
u16 num
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
=
SWAP16(SWAP16(
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
pos))
-
num);
}
break
;
case
7
:
/
*
Randomly add to word, random endian.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
2
)
break
;
if
(UR(
2
)) {
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
1
);
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
+
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
}
else
{
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
1
);
u16 num
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
=
SWAP16(SWAP16(
*
(u16
*
)(out_buf
+
pos))
+
num);
}
break
;
case
8
:
/
*
Randomly subtract
from
dword, random endian.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
4
)
break
;
if
(UR(
2
)) {
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
3
);
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
-
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
}
else
{
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
3
);
u32 num
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
=
SWAP32(SWAP32(
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
pos))
-
num);
}
break
;
case
9
:
/
*
Randomly add to dword, random endian.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
4
)
break
;
if
(UR(
2
)) {
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
3
);
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
+
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
}
else
{
u32 pos
=
UR(temp_len
-
3
);
u32 num
=
1
+
UR(ARITH_MAX);
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
pos)
=
SWAP32(SWAP32(
*
(u32
*
)(out_buf
+
pos))
+
num);
}
break
;
case
10
:
/
*
Just
set
a random byte to a random value. Because,
why
not
. We use XOR with
1
-
255
to eliminate the
possibility of a no
-
op.
*
/
out_buf[UR(temp_len)] ^
=
1
+
UR(
255
);
break
;
case
11
...
12
: {
/
*
Delete bytes. We're making this a bit more likely
than insertion (the
next
option)
in
hopes of keeping
files reasonably small.
*
/
u32 del_from, del_len;
if
(temp_len <
2
)
break
;
/
*
Don't delete too much.
*
/
del_len
=
choose_block_len(temp_len
-
1
);
del_from
=
UR(temp_len
-
del_len
+
1
);
memmove(out_buf
+
del_from, out_buf
+
del_from
+
del_len,
temp_len
-
del_from
-
del_len);
temp_len
-
=
del_len;
break
;
}
case
13
:
if
(temp_len
+
HAVOC_BLK_XL < MAX_FILE) {
/
*
Clone bytes (
75
%
)
or
insert a block of constant bytes (
25
%
).
*
/
u8 actually_clone
=
UR(
4
);
u32 clone_from, clone_to, clone_len;
u8
*
new_buf;
if
(actually_clone) {
clone_len
=
choose_block_len(temp_len);
clone_from
=
UR(temp_len
-
clone_len
+
1
);
}
else
{
clone_len
=
choose_block_len(HAVOC_BLK_XL);
clone_from
=
0
;
}
clone_to
=
UR(temp_len);
new_buf
=
ck_alloc_nozero(temp_len
+
clone_len);
/
*
Head
*
/
memcpy(new_buf, out_buf, clone_to);
/
*
Inserted part
*
/
if
(actually_clone)
memcpy(new_buf
+
clone_to, out_buf
+
clone_from, clone_len);
else
memset(new_buf
+
clone_to,
UR(
2
) ? UR(
256
) : out_buf[UR(temp_len)], clone_len);
/
*
Tail
*
/
memcpy(new_buf
+
clone_to
+
clone_len, out_buf
+
clone_to,
temp_len
-
clone_to);
ck_free(out_buf);
out_buf
=
new_buf;
temp_len
+
=
clone_len;
}
break
;
case
14
: {
/
*
Overwrite bytes with a randomly selected chunk (
75
%
)
or
fixed
bytes (
25
%
).
*
/
u32 copy_from, copy_to, copy_len;
if
(temp_len <
2
)
break
;
copy_len
=
choose_block_len(temp_len
-
1
);
copy_from
=
UR(temp_len
-
copy_len
+
1
);
copy_to
=
UR(temp_len
-
copy_len
+
1
);
if
(UR(
4
)) {
if
(copy_from !
=
copy_to)
memmove(out_buf
+
copy_to, out_buf
+
copy_from, copy_len);
}
else
memset(out_buf
+
copy_to,
UR(
2
) ? UR(
256
) : out_buf[UR(temp_len)], copy_len);
break
;
}
/
*
Values
15
and
16
can be selected only
if
there are
any
extras
present
in
the dictionaries.
*
/
case
15
: {
/
*
Overwrite bytes with an extra.
*
/
if
(!extras_cnt || (a_extras_cnt && UR(
2
))) {
/
*
No user
-
specified extras
or
odds
in
our favor. Let's use an
auto
-
detected one.
*
/
u32 use_extra
=
UR(a_extras_cnt);
u32 extra_len
=
a_extras[use_extra].
len
;
u32 insert_at;
if
(extra_len > temp_len)
break
;
insert_at
=
UR(temp_len
-
extra_len
+
1
);
memcpy(out_buf
+
insert_at, a_extras[use_extra].data, extra_len);
}
else
{
/
*
No auto extras
or
odds
in
our favor. Use the dictionary.
*
/
u32 use_extra
=
UR(extras_cnt);
u32 extra_len
=
extras[use_extra].
len
;
u32 insert_at;
if
(extra_len > temp_len)
break
;
insert_at
=
UR(temp_len
-
extra_len
+
1
);
memcpy(out_buf
+
insert_at, extras[use_extra].data, extra_len);
}
break
;
}
case
16
: {
u32 use_extra, extra_len, insert_at
=
UR(temp_len
+
1
);
u8
*
new_buf;
/
*
Insert an extra. Do the same dice
-
rolling stuff as
for
the
previous case.
*
/
if
(!extras_cnt || (a_extras_cnt && UR(
2
))) {
use_extra
=
UR(a_extras_cnt);
extra_len
=
a_extras[use_extra].
len
;
if
(temp_len
+
extra_len >
=
MAX_FILE)
break
;
new_buf
=
ck_alloc_nozero(temp_len
+
extra_len);
/
*
Head
*
/
memcpy(new_buf, out_buf, insert_at);
/
*
Inserted part
*
/
memcpy(new_buf
+
insert_at, a_extras[use_extra].data, extra_len);
}
else
{
use_extra
=
UR(extras_cnt);
extra_len
=
extras[use_extra].
len
;
if
(temp_len
+
extra_len >
=
MAX_FILE)
break
;
new_buf
=
ck_alloc_nozero(temp_len
+
extra_len);
/
*
Head
*
/
memcpy(new_buf, out_buf, insert_at);
/
*
Inserted part
*
/
memcpy(new_buf
+
insert_at, extras[use_extra].data, extra_len);
}
/
*
Tail
*
/
memcpy(new_buf
+
insert_at
+
extra_len, out_buf
+
insert_at,
temp_len
-
insert_at);
ck_free(out_buf);
out_buf
=
new_buf;
temp_len
+
=
extra_len;
break
;
}
}
}
if
(common_fuzz_stuff(argv, out_buf, temp_len))
goto abandon_entry;
/
*
out_buf might have been mangled a bit, so let's restore it to its
original size
and
shape.
*
/
if
(temp_len <
len
) out_buf
=
ck_realloc(out_buf,
len
);
temp_len
=
len
;
memcpy(out_buf, in_buf,
len
);
/
*
If we
're finding new stuff, let'
s run
for
a bit longer, limits
permitting.
*
/
if
(queued_paths !
=
havoc_queued) {
if
(perf_score <
=
HAVOC_MAX_MULT
*
100
) {
stage_max
*
=
2
;
perf_score
*
=
2
;
}
havoc_queued
=
queued_paths;
}
}
|
最后一个阶段,它会随机选择出另外一个输入样例,然后对当前的输入样例和另外一个样例都选择出合适的偏移量,然后从该处将他们拼接起来,然后重新进入到 RANDOM HAVOC
阶段。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
#ifndef IGNORE_FINDS
/
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SPLICING
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
/
/
*
This
is
a last
-
resort strategy triggered by a full
round
with no findings.
It takes the current
input
file
, randomly selects another
input
,
and
splices them together at some offset, then relies on the havoc
code to mutate that blob.
*
/
retry_splicing:
if
(use_splicing && splice_cycle
+
+
< SPLICE_CYCLES &&
queued_paths >
1
&& queue_cur
-
>
len
>
1
) {
struct queue_entry
*
target;
u32 tid, split_at;
u8
*
new_buf;
s32 f_diff, l_diff;
/
*
First of
all
,
if
we
've modified in_buf for havoc, let'
s clean that
up...
*
/
if
(in_buf !
=
orig_in) {
ck_free(in_buf);
in_buf
=
orig_in;
len
=
queue_cur
-
>
len
;
}
/
*
Pick a random queue entry
and
seek to it. Don't splice with yourself.
*
/
do { tid
=
UR(queued_paths); }
while
(tid
=
=
current_entry);
splicing_with
=
tid;
target
=
queue;
while
(tid >
=
100
) { target
=
target
-
>next_100; tid
-
=
100
; }
while
(tid
-
-
) target
=
target
-
>
next
;
/
*
Make sure that the target has a reasonable length.
*
/
while
(target && (target
-
>
len
<
2
|| target
=
=
queue_cur)) {
target
=
target
-
>
next
;
splicing_with
+
+
;
}
if
(!target) goto retry_splicing;
/
*
Read the testcase into a new
buffer
.
*
/
fd
=
open
(target
-
>fname, O_RDONLY);
if
(fd <
0
) PFATAL(
"Unable to open '%s'"
, target
-
>fname);
new_buf
=
ck_alloc_nozero(target
-
>
len
);
ck_read(fd, new_buf, target
-
>
len
, target
-
>fname);
close(fd);
/
*
Find a suitable splicing location, somewhere between the first
and
the last differing byte. Bail out
if
the difference
is
just a single
byte
or
so.
*
/
locate_diffs(in_buf, new_buf,
MIN
(
len
, target
-
>
len
), &f_diff, &l_diff);
if
(f_diff <
0
|| l_diff <
2
|| f_diff
=
=
l_diff) {
ck_free(new_buf);
goto retry_splicing;
}
/
*
Split somewhere between the first
and
last differing byte.
*
/
split_at
=
f_diff
+
UR(l_diff
-
f_diff);
/
*
Do the thing.
*
/
len
=
target
-
>
len
;
memcpy(new_buf, in_buf, split_at);
in_buf
=
new_buf;
ck_free(out_buf);
out_buf
=
ck_alloc_nozero(
len
);
memcpy(out_buf, in_buf,
len
);
goto havoc_stage;
}
|
ret_val
的值为 0queue_cur
通过了评估,且 was_fuzzed
字段是 0,就设置 queue_cur->was_fuzzed
为 1,然后 pending_not_fuzzed
计数器减一queue_cur
是 favored
, pending_favored
计数器减一。读取其他 sync 文件夹下的 queue 文件,然后保存到自己的 queue 里。
sync_dir
文件夹while ((sd_ent = readdir(sd)))
.
开头的文件和 sync_id
即我们自己的输出文件夹out_dir/.synced/sd_ent->d_name
文件即 id_fd
里的前4个字节到 min_accept
里,设置 next_min_accept
为 min_accept
,这个值代表之前从这个文件夹里读取到的最后一个queue的id。stage_name
为 sprintf(stage_tmp, "sync %u", ++sync_cnt);
,设置 stage_cur
为 0,stage_max
为 0sync_dir/sd_ent->d_name/queue
文件夹里的目录和文件
.
开头的文件和标识小于 min_accept
的文件,因为这些文件应该已经被 sync 过了。syncing_case
大于等于 next_min_accept
,就设置 next_min_accept
为 syncing_case + 1
MAX_FILE
(默认是1M),就不进行 sync。write_to_testcase(mem, st.st_size)
,并 run_target
,然后通过 save_if_interesting
来决定是否要导入这个文件到自己的 queue 里,如果发现了新的 path,就导入。
syncing_party
的值为sd_ent->d_name
save_if_interesting
返回 1,queued_imported
计数器就加 1stage_cur
计数器加一,如果 stage_cur
是 stats_update_freq
的倍数,就刷新一次展示界面。next_min_accept
值总结来说,这个函数就是先读取有哪些 fuzzer 文件夹,然后读取其他 fuzzer 文件夹下的 queue 文件夹里的 case,并依次执行,如果发现了新 path,就保存到自己的 queue 文件夹里,而且将最后一个 sync 的 case id 写入到 .synced/其他fuzzer文件夹名
文件里,以避免重复运行。
因为 fuzz_one 部分过于庞大,而这个函数又不是那么特殊,因此把它拉出来做一个简短的说明。
post_handler
,那么就对样例调用 post_handler
run_target
执行
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
if
(fault
=
=
FAULT_TMOUT) {
if
(subseq_tmouts
+
+
> TMOUT_LIMIT) {
cur_skipped_paths
+
+
;
return
1
;
}
}
else
subseq_tmouts
=
0
;
|
queued_discovered
计数器show_stats
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
|
EXP_ST u8 common_fuzz_stuff(char
*
*
argv, u8
*
out_buf, u32
len
) {
u8 fault;
if
(post_handler) {
out_buf
=
post_handler(out_buf, &
len
);
if
(!out_buf || !
len
)
return
0
;
}
write_to_testcase(out_buf,
len
);
fault
=
run_target(argv, exec_tmout);
if
(stop_soon)
return
1
;
if
(fault
=
=
FAULT_TMOUT) {
if
(subseq_tmouts
+
+
> TMOUT_LIMIT) {
cur_skipped_paths
+
+
;
return
1
;
}
}
else
subseq_tmouts
=
0
;
/
*
Users can hit us with SIGUSR1 to request the current
input
to be abandoned.
*
/
if
(skip_requested) {
skip_requested
=
0
;
cur_skipped_paths
+
+
;
return
1
;
}
/
*
This handles FAULT_ERROR
for
us:
*
/
queued_discovered
+
=
save_if_interesting(argv, out_buf,
len
, fault);
if
(!(stage_cur
%
stats_update_freq) || stage_cur
+
1
=
=
stage_max)
show_stats();
return
0
;
}
|
执行结果是否发现了新路径,决定是否保存或跳过。如果保存了这个 case,则返回 1,否则返回 0。
fn = alloc_printf("%s/queue/id:%06u,%s", out_dir, queued_paths, describe_op(hnb))
文件里add_to_queue
hnb
的值是2,代表发现了新路径,设置刚刚加入到队列里的 queue 的 has_new_cov
字段为 1,即 queue_top->has_new_cov = 1
,然后 queued_with_cov
计数器加一calibrate_case(argv, queue_top, mem, queue_cycle - 1, 0)
KEEP_UNIQUE_CRASH
即5000,就直接返回keeping的值simplify_trace((u64 *) trace_bits)
进行规整alloc_printf("%s/crashes/id:%06llu,sig:%02u,%s", out_dir,unique_crashes, kill_signal, describe_op(0))
文件。total_tmouts
计数器加一unique_hangs
的个数超过能保存的最大数量 KEEP_UNIQUE_HANG
则返回simplify_trace((u64 *) trace_bits)
进行规整。unique_tmouts
计数器加一hang_tmout
大于 exec_tmout
,则以 hang_tmout
为timeout,重新执行一次 runt_target
keep_as_crash
unique_hangs
计数器加一,更新 last_hang_time
的值,并保存到alloc_printf("%s/hangs/id:%06llu,%s", out_dir, unique_hangs, describe_op(0))
文件。其实插桩已经叙述过一部分了,在上文中的 fork server
部分,笔者就介绍过该机制就是通过插桩实现的。
但还有一部分内容没有涉及,新路径是如何在发现的同时被通知给 fuzzer 的?
在插桩阶段,我们为每个分支跳转都添加了一小段代码,这里笔者以 64 位的情况进行说明:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
|
static const u8
*
trampoline_fmt_64
=
"\n"
"/* --- AFL TRAMPOLINE (64-BIT) --- */\n"
"\n"
".align 4\n"
"\n"
"leaq -(128+24)(%%rsp), %%rsp\n"
"movq %%rdx, 0(%%rsp)\n"
"movq %%rcx, 8(%%rsp)\n"
"movq %%rax, 16(%%rsp)\n"
"movq $0x%08x, %%rcx\n"
"call __afl_maybe_log\n"
"movq 16(%%rsp), %%rax\n"
"movq 8(%%rsp), %%rcx\n"
"movq 0(%%rsp), %%rdx\n"
"leaq (128+24)(%%rsp), %%rsp\n"
"\n"
"/* --- END --- */\n"
"\n"
;
|
它首先保存了一部分将要被破坏的寄存器,然后调用了 __afl_maybe_log
来记录路径的发现。该函数同样是由汇编编写的,但我们可以用一些其他工具来反编译它:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
char __fastcall _afl_maybe_log(__int64 a1, __int64 a2, __int64 a3, __int64 a4)
{
char v4;
/
/
of
char v5;
/
/
al
__int64 v6;
/
/
rdx
__int64 v7;
/
/
rcx
char
*
v9;
/
/
rax
int
v10;
/
/
eax
void
*
v11;
/
/
rax
int
v12;
/
/
edi
__int64 v13;
/
/
rax
__int64 v14;
/
/
rax
__int64 v15;
/
/
[rsp
-
10h
] [rbp
-
180h
]
char v16;
/
/
[rsp
+
10h
] [rbp
-
160h
]
__int64 v17;
/
/
[rsp
+
18h
] [rbp
-
158h
]
v5
=
v4;
v6
=
_afl_area_ptr;
if
( !_afl_area_ptr )
{
if
( _afl_setup_failure )
return
v5
+
127
;
v6
=
_afl_global_area_ptr;
if
( _afl_global_area_ptr )
{
_afl_area_ptr
=
_afl_global_area_ptr;
}
else
{
v16
=
v4;
v17
=
a4;
v9
=
getenv(
"__AFL_SHM_ID"
);
if
( !v9 || (v10
=
atoi(v9), v11
=
shmat(v10,
0LL
,
0
), v11
=
=
-
1LL
) )
{
+
+
_afl_setup_failure;
v5
=
v16;
return
v5
+
127
;
}
_afl_area_ptr
=
v11;
_afl_global_area_ptr
=
v11;
v15
=
v11;
if
( write(
199
, &_afl_temp,
4uLL
)
=
=
4
)
{
while
(
1
)
{
v12
=
198
;
if
( read(
198
, &_afl_temp,
4uLL
) !
=
4
)
break
;
LODWORD(v13)
=
fork();
if
( v13 <
0
)
break
;
if
( !v13 )
goto __afl_fork_resume;
_afl_fork_pid
=
v13;
write(
199
, &_afl_fork_pid,
4uLL
);
v12
=
_afl_fork_pid;
LODWORD(v14)
=
waitpid(_afl_fork_pid, &_afl_temp,
0
);
if
( v14 <
=
0
)
break
;
write(
199
, &_afl_temp,
4uLL
);
}
_exit(v12);
}
__afl_fork_resume:
close(
198
);
close(
199
);
v6
=
v15;
v5
=
v16;
a4
=
v17;
}
}
v7
=
_afl_prev_loc ^ a4;
_afl_prev_loc ^
=
v7;
_afl_prev_loc
=
_afl_prev_loc >>
1
;
+
+
*
(v6
+
v7);
return
v5
+
127
;
}
|
前面的一大段代码其实都是为了去建立我们在上文所说的“共享内存”,在完成初始化后调用最后这么一小段代码进行记录:
1
2
3
4
|
v7
=
_afl_prev_loc ^ a4;
_afl_prev_loc ^
=
v7;
_afl_prev_loc
=
_afl_prev_loc >>
1
;
+
+
*
(v6
+
v7);
|
此处 v6
即为共享内存的地址,而 a4
为 cur_location
,因此 v7=cur_location ^ prev_location
,它将作为索引,使得共享内存中的对应偏移处的值增加。而在 fuzzer 部分就可以通过检查这块内存来发现是否有新路径被得到了。
另外,_afl_prev_loc = _afl_prev_loc >> 1;
的目的是为了避开 A->A
和 B->B
以及 A->B
和 B->A
被识别为相同路径的情况。
sakuraのAFL源码全注释
https://eternalsakura13.com/2020/08/23/afl/fuzzer AFL 源码分析
https://tttang.com/user/f1taoAFL二三事——源码分析
https://paper.seebug.org/1732/#afl-afl-ascAFL漏洞挖掘技术漫谈(一):用AFL开始你的第一次Fuzzing
https://paper.seebug.org/841/
更多【 AFL 源代码速通笔记】相关视频教程:www.yxfzedu.com